Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485:2016vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how ISO 13485:2016 controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
52
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485:2016 maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 7% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 60 ISO 13485:2016 controls identifies 77 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 60 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Management responsibility – ISO 13485:2016(3 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::5.3Quality policy2 targets
AS9100D-5.2Quality Policy
AS9100D2016-5.2Quality Policy
iso-13485-2016::5.4.1Quality objectives
AS9100D2016-6.2Quality Objectives and Planning

Product realization – ISO 13485:2016(5 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::7.3Design and development2 targets
AS9100D-8.3Design and Development of Products
AS9100D2016-8.3.4Design and Development Controls
iso-13485-2016::7.5Production and service provision
AS9100D-8.5Production and Service Provision
iso-13485-2016::7.5.1Control of production and service provision
AS9100D-8.5Production and Service Provision
iso-13485-2016::7.5.8Identification
AS9100D2016-8.5.2Identification and Traceability

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 13485:2016 comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 13485:2016 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

ISO 13485:2016 has 60 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 62 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016, where 29 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485:2016 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 60 total ISO 13485:2016 controls, 6 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 77 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485:2016 to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

77 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 with 29 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485:2016 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 (29 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.