Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how ISO 13485 controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485 maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 14% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 ISO 13485 controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Measurement(2 mappings)

8.3Statement of Applicability linkage2 targets
AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment
AS9100D-8.5Production and Service Provision

ISO 13485: Patient Data Protection(1 mappings)

ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
9.1Risk communication and consultation

ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

ISO 13485: Technical Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption
9.1Risk communication and consultation

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 13485 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

ISO 13485 has 29 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards, where 5 ISO 13485 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 29 total ISO 13485 controls, 4 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485 to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

25 ISO 13485 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.