Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISMAP Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudGovernance-ISMS-RiskAssessment-SharedResponsibility-Policy-RegulatoryCompliance-RolesResponsibilitiesISMAP Cloud Governance - ISMS per ISO 27001/JIS Q 27001 + Risk Assessment + Shared Responsibility Model + Cloud Security Policy + Regulatory Compliance + Roles and Responsibilities
CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment

ISMAP Cloud Operations(3 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudOperations-Monitoring-Logging-IncidentResponse-NISC-Reporting-Vulnerability-Change-SLAISMAP Cloud Operations - Security Monitoring + SIEM + Logging + Incident Response + NISC Reporting + Vulnerability Management + Penetration Testing + Change Management + SLA Management3 targets
CPS230-13Board Accountability
CPS230-13Board Accountability
CPS230-22Vulnerability and Gap Identification

ISMAP Data Protection(1 mappings)

ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM
CPS230-28Recovery Objectives

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 3 map directly to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

5 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.