TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsBSI IT-Grundschutz

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to BSI IT-Grundschutz. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to BSI IT-Grundschutz with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

ISMAP Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudGovernance-ISMS-RiskAssessment-SharedResponsibility-Policy-RegulatoryCompliance-RolesResponsibilitiesISMAP Cloud Governance - ISMS per ISO 27001/JIS Q 27001 + Risk Assessment + Shared Responsibility Model + Cloud Security Policy + Regulatory Compliance + Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
→BSI-13Risk assessment procedures
→BSI-15Security categorization
→BSI-17Continuous monitoring strategy

ISMAP Cloud Infrastructure(3 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudInfrastructure-NetworkSegmentation-Container-Serverless-WorkloadProtection-Hardening-ConfigManagementISMAP Cloud Infrastructure - VPC Network Segmentation + Container/Serverless Security + Cloud Workload Protection (CWPP) + Image/Template Hardening + CIS Benchmarks + Configuration Management + IaC3 targets
→BSI-23Baseline configuration establishment
→BSI-24Configuration change control
→BSI-26System component inventory

ISMAP Cloud Operations(9 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudOperations-Monitoring-Logging-IncidentResponse-NISC-Reporting-Vulnerability-Change-SLAISMAP Cloud Operations - Security Monitoring + SIEM + Logging + Incident Response + NISC Reporting + Vulnerability Management + Penetration Testing + Change Management + SLA Management9 targets
→BSI-14Vulnerability scanning and management
→BSI-17Continuous monitoring strategy
→BSI-18Incident response planning and testing
→BSI-20Incident reporting and notification
→BSI-21Forensic analysis capabilities
→BSI-24Configuration change control
→BSI-28Audit event logging and storage
→BSI-29Audit record review and analysis
→BSI-31Audit log protection and retention

ISMAP Data Protection(2 mappings)

ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM2 targets
→BSI-08Cryptographic protection of data
→BSI-15Security categorization

ISMAP Identity + Access(3 mappings)

ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM3 targets
→BSI-01Account management and provisioning
→BSI-02Access enforcement and least privilege
→BSI-03Multi-factor authentication requirements

Related Comparisons

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

ISMAP (Japan) vs MITRE D3FEND5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Spain ENS5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappings

Other BSI IT-Grundschutz comparisons

Ghana Cybersecurity Act vs BSI IT-Grundschutz20 mappingsFISMA vs BSI IT-Grundschutz20 mappingsSaudi NCA ECC vs BSI IT-Grundschutz20 mappingsSpain ENS vs BSI IT-Grundschutz20 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs BSI IT-Grundschutz19 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs BSI IT-Grundschutz19 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs BSI IT-Grundschutz18 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs BSI IT-Grundschutz18 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and BSI IT-Grundschutz?

ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while BSI IT-Grundschutz covers 55 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct BSI IT-Grundschutz equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and BSI IT-Grundschutz?

Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 5 map directly to BSI IT-Grundschutz controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to BSI IT-Grundschutz?

3 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in BSI IT-Grundschutz. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and BSI IT-Grundschutz?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.