TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsISO/IEC 27011:2024

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to ISO/IEC 27011:2024. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISMAP Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudGovernance-ISMS-RiskAssessment-SharedResponsibility-Policy-RegulatoryCompliance-RolesResponsibilitiesISMAP Cloud Governance - ISMS per ISO 27001/JIS Q 27001 + Risk Assessment + Shared Responsibility Model + Cloud Security Policy + Regulatory Compliance + Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
→27011-1Scope
→27011-3Terms and definitions
→27400-3Terms and definitions

ISMAP Cloud Infrastructure(3 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudInfrastructure-NetworkSegmentation-Container-Serverless-WorkloadProtection-Hardening-ConfigManagementISMAP Cloud Infrastructure - VPC Network Segmentation + Container/Serverless Security + Cloud Workload Protection (CWPP) + Image/Template Hardening + CIS Benchmarks + Configuration Management + IaC3 targets
→27011-6.3Awareness and Training
→27011-6.3Awareness and Training
→27011-8.2Network security and segregation

ISMAP Cloud Operations(2 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudOperations-Monitoring-Logging-IncidentResponse-NISC-Reporting-Vulnerability-Change-SLAISMAP Cloud Operations - Security Monitoring + SIEM + Logging + Incident Response + NISC Reporting + Vulnerability Management + Penetration Testing + Change Management + SLA Management2 targets
→27011-8.4Logging and monitoring
→27011-8.5Vulnerability and malware management

ISMAP Data Protection(6 mappings)

ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM6 targets
→27011-5.2Information Security Roles in Telecoms
→27011-5.2Information Security Roles in Telecoms
→27011-6.3Awareness and Training
→27011-6.3Awareness and Training
→27011-8.3Cryptography and key management
→27011-8.6Data protection and backup

ISMAP Identity + Access(2 mappings)

ISMAP-Identity-Access-MFA-Privileged-Federation-SSO-API-Tokens-CloudIAM-PIV-PASETOISMAP Identity and Access Management - Cloud IAM + Multi-Factor Authentication + Privileged Access + Federation/SSO + API Security + Access Tokens + My Number Card Integration + Government IAM2 targets
→27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices
→27011-8.1User Endpoint Devices

Related Comparisons

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

ISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP ASVS5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs MITRE D3FEND5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs BSI IT-Grundschutz5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)5 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ISO/IEC 27011:202414 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ISO/IEC 27011:202413 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202413 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202413 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27011:202412 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27011:2024 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27011:2024 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 5 map directly to ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

3 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27011:2024. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 27011:2024?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.