Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Privacy FrameworkvsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management

See exactly how NIST Privacy Framework controls map to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Privacy Framework maps to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST Privacy Framework controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect-P Maintenance and Technology.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Identify-P(7 mappings)

NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment7 targets
CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review
CPS230-27Incident Management
CPS230-27Incident Management
CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management
CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers

Govern-P(3 mappings)

NISTPF-2Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring3 targets
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review
CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management

Protect-P Processes(6 mappings)

NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)6 targets
CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
CPS230-16Internal Audit Review
CPS230-22Vulnerability and Gap Identification
CPS230-28Recovery Objectives
CPS230-37Service Provider Management Policy
CPS230-46Ongoing Risk Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST Privacy Framework and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

NIST Privacy Framework has 8 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management covers 47 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect-P Maintenance and Technology, where 1 NIST Privacy Framework controls have no direct APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Privacy Framework and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

Of 8 total NIST Privacy Framework controls, 3 map directly to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Privacy Framework to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

5 NIST Privacy Framework controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect-P Maintenance and Technology with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Privacy Framework and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protect-P Maintenance and Technology (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.