TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions)vsUN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)

See exactly how ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls map to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) maps to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) with 30% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Safe and Healthy Working Environment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Elimination of Forced Labour(3 mappings)

ILO-FP-2.2Abolition of Forced Labour Convention (C105)3 targets
→GP 13Avoid Causing Harm
→GP 20Tracking Effectiveness
→GP 21External Communication

Abolition of Child Labour(6 mappings)

ILO-FP-3.1Minimum Age Convention (C138)3 targets
→GP 13Avoid Causing Harm
→GP 20Tracking Effectiveness
→GP 21External Communication
ILO-FP-3.2Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (C182)3 targets
→GP 13Avoid Causing Harm
→GP 20Tracking Effectiveness
→GP 21External Communication

Related Comparisons

Other ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) comparisons

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs ASEAN Data Management Framework4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs EU Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) Strategy4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises (MNE Declaration)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)4 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)4 mappings

Other UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) comparisons

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)4 mappingsEU Taxonomy Regulation vs UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)4 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)4 mappingsUS OFAC Sanctions Compliance Framework vs UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)4 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)3 mappingsEU Better Internet for Kids (BIK+) Strategy vs UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)3 mappingsBank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) vs UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)3 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) has 10 controls across its framework, while UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Safe and Healthy Working Environment, where 2 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

Of 10 total ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls, 3 map directly to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

7 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) controls have no direct equivalent in UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Safe and Healthy Working Environment with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Safe and Healthy Working Environment (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.