Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsUN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) with 10% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Disclosure Artefacts(1 mappings)

29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
UNGPBHR-2Pillar II: Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights

Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts(1 mappings)

29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
UNGPBHR-2Pillar II: Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights

Clause 7: Publishing Vulnerability Advisories(1 mappings)

29147-7.8Remediation information
UNGPBHR-2Pillar II: Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights

Clause 1-4: Introduction(2 mappings)

30111-1Scope
UNGPBHR-2Pillar II: Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights
30111-3Terms and definitions
UNGPBHR-2Pillar II: Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 29147:2018 comparisons

Other UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 40 controls across its framework, while UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) covers 4 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports, where 7 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

Of 40 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 5 map directly to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

43 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Receiving Vulnerability Reports (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.