Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsFedRAMP Rev 5

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to FedRAMP Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

56
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to FedRAMP Rev 5 with 75% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Management System Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 56 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Protection Measures — Access Control and Authentication(19 mappings)

ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy7 targets
3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
FEDRAMP-CA-1Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring Policy
FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
ICS-AC-3Account management
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
ISMSP-AC-02User Account Management3 targets
CJIS-6Account Management
ICS-AC-3Account management
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
ISMSP-AC-03Authentication Mechanisms4 targets
CJIS-5Identification and Authentication
FEDRAMP-PS-4Personnel Termination
ICS-AC-2Authentication mechanisms
NIS2-IA-12Multi-Factor Authentication
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control5 targets
3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy

Management System Requirements(1 mappings)

ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
FEDRAMP-RA-3Risk Assessment

+36 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and FedRAMP Rev 5?

South Korea ISMS-P has 20 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Rev 5 covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Management System Requirements, where 3 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct FedRAMP Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and FedRAMP Rev 5?

Of 20 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 15 map directly to FedRAMP Rev 5 controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to FedRAMP Rev 5?

5 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Management System Requirements with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and FedRAMP Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Management System Requirements (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.