HKMA SPMvsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)
See exactly how HKMA SPM controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
HKMA SPM maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 18% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 HKMA SPM controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
HKMA SPM: Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)(3 mappings)
HKMA SPM: Technology Management Modules (TM-G-1 to TM-G-4, TM-E-1 e-Banking) + Coordination with C-RAF(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other HKMA SPM comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between HKMA SPM and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
HKMA SPM has 11 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG), where 4 HKMA SPM controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.
How many controls map between HKMA SPM and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
Of 11 total HKMA SPM controls, 2 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA SPM to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
9 HKMA SPM controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA SPM and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
The domain with the highest gap count is HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.