TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA SPMvsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems

See exactly how HKMA SPM controls map to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA SPM maps to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems with 27% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 HKMA SPM controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

HKMA SPM: Corporate Governance (CG-1/2/3/5/6), Internal Control (IC-1/5), Auditing (AC-G)(2 mappings)

HKMA-SPM-CG-IC-AC-Governance-Control-AuditHKMA SPM Corporate Governance (CG-1/2/3/5/6), Internal Control (IC-1/5), Auditing (AC-G)2 targets
→NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
→NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities

HKMA SPM: Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)(2 mappings)

HKMA-SPM-OR-RR-SA-OperationalResilienceHKMA SPM Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)2 targets
→NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
→NISTSP34-4Information System Contingency Plan (ISCP) Development

HKMA SPM: Technology Management Modules (TM-G-1 to TM-G-4, TM-E-1 e-Banking) + Coordination with C-RAF(1 mappings)

HKMA-SPM-TM-Technology-TM-G-1-CRAF-CoordHKMA SPM Technology Management Modules (TM-G-1 to TM-G-4, TM-E-1) + Coordination with C-RAF
→NISTSP34-3Preventive Controls and Recovery Strategies: Backup, Alternate Sites, Equipment

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA SPM comparisons

HKMA SPM vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20243 mappingsHKMA SPM vs OWASP ASVS3 mappingsHKMA SPM vs MITRE D3FEND3 mappingsHKMA SPM vs APRA CPS 2343 mappingsHKMA SPM vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements3 mappingsHKMA SPM vs ISO/IEC 27011:20243 mappingsHKMA SPM vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar3 mappingsHKMA SPM vs ISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution3 mappings

Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between HKMA SPM and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

HKMA SPM has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG), where 4 HKMA SPM controls have no direct NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA SPM and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

Of 11 total HKMA SPM controls, 3 map directly to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA SPM to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

8 HKMA SPM controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA SPM and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.