TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

41
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
51%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 51% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(11 mappings)

3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→OMAN-PRO-03Network and Endpoint Security
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→OMAN-PRO-03Network and Endpoint Security
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings2 targets
→FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup3 targets
→FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→FAA-CS-4.3Recovery Capabilities
→KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
→OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(8 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment6 targets
→CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
→JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
→RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance2 targets
→FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability

Incident Response and Media Protection(1 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition
→FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management

+21 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (51% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 7 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 18 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 51% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

17 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.