HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsCOSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)
See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) with 17% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Domain 3: Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Domain 1: Governance(10 mappings)
Domain 3: Protection(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons
Other COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 24 controls across its framework, while COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Domain 3: Protection, where 5 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) equivalent.
How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?
Of 24 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 4 map directly to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?
20 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). The highest concentration of gaps is in Domain 3: Protection with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Domain 3: Protection (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.