Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 23894:2023vsCOSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls map to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 maps to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) with 18% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Process (Clause 6).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Scope, Terms and References (Clauses 1-3)(4 mappings)

ISO23894-1Scope of AI Risk Management2 targets
Principle 3Defines Desired Culture
Principle 7Defines Risk Appetite
ISO23894-3AI-Specific Terminology2 targets
Principle 3Defines Desired Culture
Principle 7Defines Risk Appetite

Framework (Clause 5)(9 mappings)

ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment3 targets
Principle 17Pursues Improvement in ERM
Principle 18Leverages Information and Technology
Principle 19Communicates Risk Information
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration3 targets
Principle 17Pursues Improvement in ERM
Principle 18Leverages Information and Technology
Principle 19Communicates Risk Information
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation3 targets
Principle 17Pursues Improvement in ERM
Principle 18Leverages Information and Technology
Principle 19Communicates Risk Information

Process (Clause 6)(2 mappings)

ISO23894-6.2Scope, Context and Criteria2 targets
Principle 3Defines Desired Culture
Principle 7Defines Risk Appetite

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 23894:2023 comparisons

Other COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 has 33 controls across its framework, while COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Process (Clause 6), where 8 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

Of 33 total ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, 6 map directly to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 23894:2023 to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

27 ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). The highest concentration of gaps is in Process (Clause 6) with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 23894:2023 and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Process (Clause 6) (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.