TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) with 67% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(10 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control2 targets
→AESCSF-IAM-2Access Control
→AESCSF-RM-2Risk Assessment Process
NIST82-CTL-02OT Authentication and Credential Management
→AESCSF-IAM-3Multi-Factor Authentication
NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring3 targets
→AESCSF-ACM-3Change Management
→AESCSF-SA-1Logging and Monitoring
→AESCSF-SA-2Anomaly Detection
NIST82-CTL-04OT Patch Management2 targets
→AESCSF-TVM-3Patch Management
→CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management2 targets
→AESCSF-ACM-2Configuration Management
→AESCSF-ACM-3Change Management

OT Incident Response(10 mappings)

NIST82-IR-01OT Incident Response Planning3 targets
→AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan
→AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability
→AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting
NIST82-IR-02OT Anomaly Detection
→AESCSF-SA-2Anomaly Detection
NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment3 targets
→AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan
→AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability
→AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting
NIST82-IR-05OT Forensics3 targets
→AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan
→AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability
→AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs API 116416 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IEC 6244316 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)24 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)22 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Risk Management, where 3 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 14 map directly to Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls — representing 67% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)?

7 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF). The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Risk Management with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Risk Management (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.