HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)vsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices
See exactly how HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls map to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) maps to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices with 46% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Domain 3: Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Domain 1: Governance(8 mappings)
Domain 3: Protection(4 mappings)
Domain 4: Detection(2 mappings)
Domain 5: Response and Recovery(6 mappings)
+2 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons
Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) has 24 controls across its framework, while ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Domain 3: Protection, where 3 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices equivalent.
How many controls map between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
Of 24 total HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls, 11 map directly to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
13 HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls have no direct equivalent in ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. The highest concentration of gaps is in Domain 3: Protection with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
The domain with the highest gap count is Domain 3: Protection (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.