FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices
See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices with 30% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(2 mappings)
Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(6 mappings)
Domain 4: External Dependency Management(1 mappings)
Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(4 mappings)
Maturity Levels(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Other ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 27 controls across its framework, while ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices equivalent.
How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
Of 27 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 8 map directly to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
19 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices?
The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.