HIPAA Security RulevsNIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
See exactly how HIPAA Security Rule controls map to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
HIPAA Security Rule maps to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 with 75% coverage across 50 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls identifies 17 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Administrative.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 67 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 133 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Administrative(20 mappings)
+113 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The HIPAA Security Rule to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls your existing HIPAA Security Rule work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. HIPAA Security Rule into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 lands at 30.9%, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into HIPAA Security Rule lands at 58.2%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your HIPAA Security Rule evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3, the other asks the reverse.
30 of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for HIPAA Security Rule. 67 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Documented review and modification of user access rights evidences account modification and recertification.
Grounded in 164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of CUI within the system and between connected systems.
Every one of the 30 evidenced controls and 67 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
39 of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 28 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Risk assessment covers likelihood and impact of unauthorised access, disclosure, modification and destruction.
Grounded in 03.11.01 Risk Assessment. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Covered entities and business associates must ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all electronic protected health information (ePHI) they create, receive, maintain, or transmit; protect against reasonably anticipated...
Every one of the 39 evidenced controls and 28 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 75% in the header counts how many HIPAA Security Rule controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other HIPAA Security Rule comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between HIPAA Security Rule and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?
HIPAA Security Rule has 67 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 covers 97 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 50 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Administrative, where 9 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 equivalent.
How many controls map between HIPAA Security Rule and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?
Of 67 total HIPAA Security Rule controls, 50 map directly to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, representing 75% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping HIPAA Security Rule to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?
17 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. The highest concentration of gaps is in Administrative with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between HIPAA Security Rule and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?
The domain with the highest gap count is Administrative (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.