HIPAA Security RulevsISO 27001:2022
See exactly how HIPAA Security Rule controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27001:2022 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
HIPAA Security Rule maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 100% coverage across 67 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Policies and Procedures.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 67 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 212 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Administrative(20 mappings)
+192 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The HIPAA Security Rule to ISO 27001:2022 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27001:2022 controls your existing HIPAA Security Rule work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. HIPAA Security Rule into ISO 27001:2022 lands at 50.5%, while ISO 27001:2022 into HIPAA Security Rule lands at 79.1%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your HIPAA Security Rule evidence buys you for ISO 27001:2022, the other asks the reverse.
47 of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for HIPAA Security Rule. 46 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
A managed policy hierarchy with ownership, versioning and review is the security policy set.
Grounded in 164.316(a) Policies and Procedures (Standard). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Classify information by confidentiality, integrity, availability and interested-party requirements.
Every one of the 47 evidenced controls and 46 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
53 of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27001:2022. 14 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
A disciplinary process is the sanction policy this specification requires.
Grounded in iso-27001-2022::6.4 Disciplinary process. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Covered entities and business associates must ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all electronic protected health information (ePHI) they create, receive, maintain, or transmit; protect against reasonably anticipated...
Every one of the 53 evidenced controls and 14 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many HIPAA Security Rule controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27001:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other HIPAA Security Rule comparisons
Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between HIPAA Security Rule and ISO 27001:2022?
HIPAA Security Rule has 67 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 93 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 67 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Policies and Procedures, where 0 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between HIPAA Security Rule and ISO 27001:2022?
Of 67 total HIPAA Security Rule controls, 67 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping HIPAA Security Rule to ISO 27001:2022?
0 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Policies and Procedures with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between HIPAA Security Rule and ISO 27001:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is Policies and Procedures (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.