TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsNIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) with 18% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

FTC Safeguards Rule: 9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Encryption, MFA, Disposal, Change, Monitoring, Pen Test (314.4(c))(4 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))4 targets
→PQC-2FIPS 203 ML-KEM Implementation - Module-Lattice Key-Encapsulation Mechanism
→PQC-5Cryptographic Inventory and PQC Migration Roadmap
→PQC-7FIPS Validated Modules, HSM Readiness, and Algorithm Validation
→PQC-8Implementation Requirements - RNG, Side-Channel, Key Management, Operations, Incident Response

FTC Safeguards Rule: Scope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
→PQC-4FIPS 205 SLH-DSA Implementation - Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs India DPDP Act6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 20226 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Switzerland FADP6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Barbados Data Protection Act 20196 mappings

Other NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination), where 5 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

Of 11 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 2 map directly to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

9 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). The highest concentration of gaps is in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

The domain with the highest gap count is FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.