TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
55%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) with 55% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

FTC Safeguards Rule: 9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Encryption, MFA, Disposal, Change, Monitoring, Pen Test (314.4(c))(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))2 targets
→LOPDP-EC-Governance-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-Privacy-by-Design-Training-Articles-46-58-Compliance-MonitoringEcuador LOPDP Governance + DPO + ROPA + DPIA + Privacy by Design + Training
→LOPDP-EC-Security-Processor-Breach-Notification-Articles-37-45-Encryption-72-Hour-SPDP-Notification-CSIRTEcuador LOPDP Security + Processor + Breach Notification + Articles 37-45 + 72-Hour

FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination)(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→LOPDP-EC-Governance-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-Privacy-by-Design-Training-Articles-46-58-Compliance-MonitoringEcuador LOPDP Governance + DPO + ROPA + DPIA + Privacy by Design + Training

FTC Safeguards Rule: Written Incident Response Plan, Board Reporting and FTC Breach Notification (314.4(h-j))(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))2 targets
→LOPDP-EC-Governance-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-Privacy-by-Design-Training-Articles-46-58-Compliance-MonitoringEcuador LOPDP Governance + DPO + ROPA + DPIA + Privacy by Design + Training
→LOPDP-EC-Security-Processor-Breach-Notification-Articles-37-45-Encryption-72-Hour-SPDP-Notification-CSIRTEcuador LOPDP Security + Processor + Breach Notification + Articles 37-45 + 72-Hour

FTC Safeguards Rule: Written Risk Assessment (314.4(b))(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))
→LOPDP-EC-Governance-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-Privacy-by-Design-Training-Articles-46-58-Compliance-MonitoringEcuador LOPDP Governance + DPO + ROPA + DPIA + Privacy by Design + Training

FTC Safeguards Rule: Scope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
→LOPDP-EC-Security-Processor-Breach-Notification-Articles-37-45-Encryption-72-Hour-SPDP-Notification-CSIRTEcuador LOPDP Security + Processor + Breach Notification + Articles 37-45 + 72-Hour

FTC Safeguards Rule: Service Provider Oversight and Program Evaluation (314.4(d-g))(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))
→LOPDP-EC-Governance-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-Privacy-by-Design-Training-Articles-46-58-Compliance-MonitoringEcuador LOPDP Governance + DPO + ROPA + DPIA + Privacy by Design + Training

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Vermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs India DPDP Act6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 20226 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)6 mappings

Other Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) comparisons

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)5 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)5 mappingsFederal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL) vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)5 mappingsJamaica Data Protection Act 2020 vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)5 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)5 mappingsIowa Consumer Data Protection Act vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)5 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)5 mappingsIndonesia PDP Law vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 11 controls across its framework, while Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (55% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination), where 4 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)?

Of 11 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 6 map directly to Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) controls — representing 55% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)?

5 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP). The highest concentration of gaps is in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)?

The domain with the highest gap count is FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.