TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsNIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) with 12% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(1 mappings)

AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
→FIPS 205 Sec. 6Hash Function Instantiations

Network and Communications Security(10 mappings)

AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security5 targets
→FIPS 203 Sec. 5.2Encapsulation (Encaps)
→FIPS 203 Sec. 5.3Decapsulation (Decaps)
→Impl. Req. 3Key Management and Storage
→Impl. Req. 4Algorithm Validation
→Impl. Req. 5Migration Planning
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection5 targets
→FIPS 203 Sec. 5.2Encapsulation (Encaps)
→FIPS 203 Sec. 5.3Decapsulation (Decaps)
→Impl. Req. 3Key Management and Storage
→Impl. Req. 4Algorithm Validation
→Impl. Req. 5Migration Planning

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CSA CCM v418 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea ISMS-P18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs Azure Security Benchmark16 mappings

Other NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) comparisons

3GPP Security vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)6 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)6 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)6 mappingsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)6 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)6 mappingsEAR — Export Administration Regulations vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)6 mappingsFBI CJIS Security Policy vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 25 controls across its framework, while NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) covers 23 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Recovery, where 9 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

Of 25 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 3 map directly to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

22 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Recovery with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Recovery (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.