TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
55%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 55% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 341K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 341K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

FTC Safeguards Rule: 9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Encryption, MFA, Disposal, Change, Monitoring, Pen Test (314.4(c))(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel

FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination)(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment

FTC Safeguards Rule: Written Incident Response Plan, Board Reporting and FTC Breach Notification (314.4(h-j))(3 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))3 targets
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain5-6-Response-Recovery-SitAwarenessHKMA C-RAF Domain 5 (Response and Recovery) + Domain 6 (Situational Awareness) - Incident Response, Recovery, Threat Landscape, Information Sharing

FTC Safeguards Rule: Written Risk Assessment (314.4(b))(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))2 targets
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain5-6-Response-Recovery-SitAwarenessHKMA C-RAF Domain 5 (Response and Recovery) + Domain 6 (Situational Awareness) - Incident Response, Recovery, Threat Landscape, Information Sharing

FTC Safeguards Rule: Scope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment

FTC Safeguards Rule: Service Provider Oversight and Program Evaluation (314.4(d-g))(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))2 targets
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain1-2-Governance-IdentificationHKMA C-RAF Domain 1 (Governance) + Domain 2 (Identification) - Cyber Strategy, Risk Management, Asset Management, Threat Assessment
→HKMA-CRAF-Domain3-4-Protection-DetectionHKMA C-RAF Domain 3 (Protection) + Domain 4 (Detection) - Access, Data, Infrastructure, Application, Monitoring, Testing, Threat Intel

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs India DPDP Act6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs India CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 20226 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Switzerland FADP6 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Barbados Data Protection Act 20196 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management6 mappings

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

Ghana Cybersecurity Act vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsGLBA vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsFISMA vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 701 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (341K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 11 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (55% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination), where 4 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

Of 11 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 6 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 55% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

5 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.