TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information SystemsvsNIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)

See exactly how NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls map to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems maps to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Impact-Aligned Recovery + RMF Integration.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Contingency Planning Policy and Programme(1 mappings)

NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
→PQC-4FIPS 205 SLH-DSA Implementation - Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature

Business Impact Analysis(1 mappings)

NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
→PQC-4FIPS 205 SLH-DSA Implementation - Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature

Preventive Controls and Recovery Strategies(4 mappings)

NISTSP34-3Preventive Controls and Recovery Strategies: Backup, Alternate Sites, Equipment4 targets
→PQC-2FIPS 203 ML-KEM Implementation - Module-Lattice Key-Encapsulation Mechanism
→PQC-5Cryptographic Inventory and PQC Migration Roadmap
→PQC-7FIPS Validated Modules, HSM Readiness, and Algorithm Validation
→PQC-8Implementation Requirements - RNG, Side-Channel, Key Management, Operations, Incident Response

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons

NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs OWASP ASVS4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs Azure Security Benchmark4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs ISO/IEC 27011:20244 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs FedRAMP Rev 54 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs GLBA4 mappings

Other NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Impact-Aligned Recovery + RMF Integration, where 1 NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls have no direct NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

Of 8 total NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls, 3 map directly to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems to NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

5 NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205). The highest concentration of gaps is in Impact-Aligned Recovery + RMF Integration with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards (FIPS 203, 204, 205)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Impact-Aligned Recovery + RMF Integration (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.