TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vs3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
47
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) with 2% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(2 mappings)

CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics2 targets
→TS33.501-13.1NF Registration and Discovery Security
→TS33.501-13.4OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)12 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification11 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs ISO 27001:202211 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.010 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Privacy Framework9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappings

Other 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)38 mappingsNIST SP 800-187 vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)22 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)5 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)5 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)5 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)5 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)5 mappingsISO 27018 vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 1 map directly to 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501) controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)?

48 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501). The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.