FedRAMP ModeratevsNIST SP 800-218
See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to NIST SP 800-218. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-218 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FedRAMP Moderate maps to NIST SP 800-218 with 15% coverage across 50 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 273 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in AC - Access Control.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 323 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 89 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
AT - Awareness and Training(1 mappings)
CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(3 mappings)
CM - Configuration Management(16 mappings)
+69 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The FedRAMP Moderate to NIST SP 800-218 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-218 controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into NIST SP 800-218 lands at 42.9%, while NIST SP 800-218 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 6.8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-218, the other asks the reverse.
18 of 42 NIST SP 800-218 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 24 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Developer must follow a documented process that explicitly addresses security requirements
Grounded in SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools. a. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to follow a documented development process that: 1. Explicitly addresses security and privacy requirements; 2. Identifies the. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Define and assign roles and responsibilities for secure software development across product, engineering, security, and operations. Make the responsibilities measurable so that ownership for security work is clear.
Every one of the 18 evidenced controls and 24 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
22 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-218. 301 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Penetration testing on a defined cadence tied to risk is stated directly by this control.
Grounded in SP800-218-PW.8.1 Executable Testing for Security. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Develop and disseminate access control policy and procedures; review at least annually (FedRAMP parameter); update following defined events.
Every one of the 22 evidenced controls and 301 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 15% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-218 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-218 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and NIST SP 800-218?
FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-218 covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 50 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC - Access Control, where 43 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct NIST SP 800-218 equivalent.
How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and NIST SP 800-218?
Of 323 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 50 map directly to NIST SP 800-218 controls, representing 15% coverage. The remaining 273 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to NIST SP 800-218?
273 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-218. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC - Access Control with 43 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and NIST SP 800-218?
The domain with the highest gap count is AC - Access Control (43 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.