FedRAMP ModeratevsAustralia My Health Records Act 2012
See exactly how FedRAMP Moderate controls map to Australia My Health Records Act 2012. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FedRAMP Moderate maps to Australia My Health Records Act 2012 with 16% coverage across 52 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls identifies 271 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in AC - Access Control.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 323 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 60 mapped controls across 14 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
AC - Access Control(12 mappings)
AT - Awareness and Training(6 mappings)
AU - Audit and Accountability(2 mappings)
+40 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The FedRAMP Moderate to Australia My Health Records Act 2012 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls your existing FedRAMP Moderate work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. FedRAMP Moderate into Australia My Health Records Act 2012 lands at 22.5%, while Australia My Health Records Act 2012 into FedRAMP Moderate lands at 8%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your FedRAMP Moderate evidence buys you for Australia My Health Records Act 2012, the other asks the reverse.
9 of 40 Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for FedRAMP Moderate. 31 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Mandatory external incident reporting to authorities within a fixed timeframe is the notification mechanism.
Grounded in IR-6 Incident Reporting. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Collect, use and disclose health information in a My Health Record only as authorised by the Act (Part 4 Div 2).
Every one of the 9 evidenced controls and 31 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
26 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Australia My Health Records Act 2012. 297 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Mandates a written policy governing security of and access to the record system.
Grounded in MYHR-SEC-1 Written security and access policy. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Prevent further access by initiating device lock after 15 minutes inactivity (FedRAMP) or upon user request.
Every one of the 26 evidenced controls and 297 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 16% in the header counts how many FedRAMP Moderate controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other FedRAMP Moderate comparisons
Other Australia My Health Records Act 2012 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FedRAMP Moderate and Australia My Health Records Act 2012?
FedRAMP Moderate has 323 controls across its framework, while Australia My Health Records Act 2012 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 52 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC - Access Control, where 34 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct Australia My Health Records Act 2012 equivalent.
How many controls map between FedRAMP Moderate and Australia My Health Records Act 2012?
Of 323 total FedRAMP Moderate controls, 52 map directly to Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls, representing 16% coverage. The remaining 271 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Moderate to Australia My Health Records Act 2012?
271 FedRAMP Moderate controls have no direct equivalent in Australia My Health Records Act 2012. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC - Access Control with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Moderate and Australia My Health Records Act 2012?
The domain with the highest gap count is AC - Access Control (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.