Cross-Framework Mapping

GDPRvsAustralia My Health Records Act 2012

See exactly how GDPR controls map to Australia My Health Records Act 2012. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

49
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
65%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which GDPR controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GDPR maps to Australia My Health Records Act 2012 with 65% coverage across 26 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 GDPR controls identifies 14 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 49 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Chapter III - Rights of the Data Subject(12 mappings)

GDPR-Art.12Transparent information, communication and modalities for rights2 targets
MYHR-GOV-4Review of decisions
MYHR-REG-2Healthcare recipient registration and identity verification
GDPR-Art.13Information to be provided where personal data are collected
MYHR-SBD-4Notice where information is not being shared
GDPR-Art.15Right of access by the data subject2 targets
MYHR-REG-2Healthcare recipient registration and identity verification
MYHR-SEC-7Consumer access controls and consent
GDPR-Art.16Right to rectification
MYHR-GOV-5Retention, destruction and correction obligations of the System Operator
GDPR-Art.17Right to erasure (right to be forgotten)
MYHR-GOV-5Retention, destruction and correction obligations of the System Operator
GDPR-Art.18Right to restriction of processing
MYHR-SEC-7Consumer access controls and consent
GDPR-Art.19Notification obligation regarding rectification, erasure or restriction
MYHR-GOV-5Retention, destruction and correction obligations of the System Operator
GDPR-Art.21Right to object
MYHR-SEC-7Consumer access controls and consent
GDPR-Art.22Automated individual decision-making, including profiling2 targets
MYHR-CUD-6Prohibition on use for a prohibited purpose
MYHR-GOV-4Review of decisions

Chapter IV - Controller and Processor(8 mappings)

GDPR-Art.24Responsibility of the controller4 targets
MYHR-CUD-5Interaction with the Privacy Act 1988
MYHR-ENF-2Civil penalty compliance
MYHR-REG-3Conditions of registration and participation
MYHR-SEC-1Written security and access policy
GDPR-Art.25Data protection by design and by default
MYHR-SEC-6Emergency access controls
GDPR-Art.28Processor
MYHR-REG-4Contracted service provider oversight
GDPR-Art.29Processing under the authority of the controller or processor2 targets
MYHR-ENF-3Criminal offences and sanctions
MYHR-SEC-4Training of authorised employees

+29 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The GDPR to Australia My Health Records Act 2012 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls your existing GDPR work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

GDPR into Australia My Health Records Act 2012
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 into GDPR
35%

14 of 40 GDPR controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Australia My Health Records Act 2012. 26 are genuine gaps.

43.8%Chapter IV - Controller and Processor
42.9%Chapter II - Principles
27.3%Chapter III - Rights of the Data Subject
16.7%Chapter V - Transfers of Personal Data
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-20. 37 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: GDPR-Art.16 Right to rectification

The System Operator must act on correction of information held.

Grounded in MYHR-GOV-5 Retention, destruction and correction obligations of the System Operator. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: GDPR-Art.10 Processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions

Process personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences, or related security measures, only under the control of official authority or where Union or Member State law authorises the processing and provides appropriate...

Every one of the 14 evidenced controls and 26 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 to GDPR
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 65% in the header counts how many GDPR controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between GDPR and Australia My Health Records Act 2012?

GDPR has 40 controls across its framework, while Australia My Health Records Act 2012 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 26 overlapping controls (65% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor, where 5 GDPR controls have no direct Australia My Health Records Act 2012 equivalent.

How many controls map between GDPR and Australia My Health Records Act 2012?

Of 40 total GDPR controls, 26 map directly to Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls, representing 65% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GDPR to Australia My Health Records Act 2012?

14 GDPR controls have no direct equivalent in Australia My Health Records Act 2012. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GDPR and Australia My Health Records Act 2012?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter IV - Controller and Processor (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.