TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
62
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual with 6% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 68 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 64 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 68 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Cybersecurity Governance(2 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→ORG-1.3Safety Policy and Objectives
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
→ORG-1.3Safety Policy and Objectives

Protection and Defense(4 mappings)

OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management3 targets
→SEC-1Aviation Security Programme
→SEC-2Security Threat and Risk Assessment
→SEC-8.3Aircraft Security
OMAN-PRO-04Security Awareness and Training
→SEC-8.2Security Training

Related Comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIS2 Directive20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappings

Other IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual comparisons

ISO 13485 vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsPCI DSS v4.0 vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 769 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 68 controls across its framework, while IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 18 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

Of 68 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 4 map directly to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 64 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

64 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.