TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsNIS2 Directive

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to NIS2 Directive. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

60
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to NIS2 Directive with 29% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 68 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 68 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 60 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Risk Management(15 mappings)

AESCSF-RM-2Risk Assessment Process
→NIS2-05Security policy for operational technology
CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process3 targets
→Art.25Preservation of Stored Data
→NIS2-07Personnel risk assessment
→NIS2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment3 targets
→Art.25Preservation of Stored Data
→NIS2-07Personnel risk assessment
→NIS2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
→NIS2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→NIS2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
→NIS2-22Configuration management for OT systems
→NIS2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
→NIS2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment3 targets
→Art.25Preservation of Stored Data
→NIS2-07Personnel risk assessment
→NIS2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

Cybersecurity Governance(5 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
→Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
→Art.2Scope
→Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
→NIS2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→Art.25Preservation of Stored Data

+40 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 769 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs C2M220 mappings

Other NIS2 Directive comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIS2 Directive28 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIS2 Directive27 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIS2 Directive27 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIS2 Directive27 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIS2 Directive27 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs NIS2 Directive27 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIS2 Directive26 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIS2 Directive26 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 769 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and NIS2 Directive?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 68 controls across its framework, while NIS2 Directive covers 80 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 11 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct NIS2 Directive equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and NIS2 Directive?

Of 68 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 20 map directly to NIS2 Directive controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to NIS2 Directive?

48 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in NIS2 Directive. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and NIS2 Directive?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.