TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual with 20% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(3 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→SEC-8.3Aircraft Security
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→ORG-1.3Safety Policy and Objectives
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→ORG-1.3Safety Policy and Objectives

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(1 mappings)

3.2.1Account data storage minimised
→SEC-8.2Security Training

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→ORG-1.3Safety Policy and Objectives

Access Control and Identification(4 mappings)

3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme2 targets
→SEC-1Aviation Security Programme
→SEC-2Security Threat and Risk Assessment
3.7.1Key generation procedures2 targets
→SEC-1Aviation Security Programme
→SEC-2Security Threat and Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual comparisons

ISO 13485 vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsPCI DSS v4.0 vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 769 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 12 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 7 map directly to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

28 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.