Cross-Framework Mapping

EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised SystemsvsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 9% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 23 EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in General Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 23 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

General Requirements(5 mappings)

Clause 1Risk management5 targets
IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

Operational Phase — Security and Access(3 mappings)

Clause 13Incident management3 targets
IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems comparisons

Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems has 23 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General Requirements, where 8 EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 23 total EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls, 2 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

21 EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in General Requirements with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is General Requirements (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.