TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

C2M2vsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how C2M2 controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

C2M2 maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 25% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 C2M2 controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

C2M2: Access Management(2 mappings)

C2M2-07Personnel risk assessment2 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

C2M2: Incident Response & Recovery(9 mappings)

C2M2-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting
C2M2-18Reporting obligations to authorities3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting
C2M2-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents3 targets
→IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
→IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
→IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

C2M2: Supply Chain & Configuration(5 mappings)

C2M2-21Supply chain risk management for critical components3 targets
→IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
→IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
C2M2-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems2 targets
→IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment
→IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other C2M2 comparisons

C2M2 vs API 116416 mappingsC2M2 vs BIMCO Cyber Security16 mappingsC2M2 vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsC2M2 vs ISO 2701916 mappingsC2M2 vs IEC 6244316 mappingsC2M2 vs IEEE 168616 mappingsC2M2 vs NIS2 Directive16 mappingsC2M2 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappings

Other EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAPI 1164 vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsEU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsCustoms-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) vs EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between C2M2 and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

C2M2 has 24 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance, where 5 C2M2 controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between C2M2 and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 24 total C2M2 controls, 6 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping C2M2 to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

18 C2M2 controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between C2M2 and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is C2M2: Asset Identification & Governance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.