Cross-Framework Mapping

EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised SystemsvsSouth Korea ISMS-P

See exactly how EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls map to South Korea ISMS-P. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems maps to South Korea ISMS-P with 35% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 23 EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in General Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 23 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

General Requirements(5 mappings)

Clause 1Risk management2 targets
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
Clause 2Personnel
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
Clause 3Suppliers and service providers2 targets
ISMSP-PI-03Third-Party Provision and Outsourcing
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management

Operational Phase — Change and Configuration(2 mappings)

Clause 10Change and configuration management2 targets
ISMSP-SYS-01System Hardening and Patch Management
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management

Operational Phase — Security and Access(3 mappings)

Clause 12Security2 targets
ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control
Clause 13Incident management
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response

Operational Phase — Release and Continuity(1 mappings)

Clause 16Business continuity
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Operational Phase — Data Management(1 mappings)

Clause 9Audit trails
ISMSP-SYS-03Security Monitoring and Log Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems and South Korea ISMS-P?

EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems has 23 controls across its framework, while South Korea ISMS-P covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General Requirements, where 6 EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls have no direct South Korea ISMS-P equivalent.

How many controls map between EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems and South Korea ISMS-P?

Of 23 total EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls, 8 map directly to South Korea ISMS-P controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems to South Korea ISMS-P?

15 EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea ISMS-P. The highest concentration of gaps is in General Requirements with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems and South Korea ISMS-P?

The domain with the highest gap count is General Requirements (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.