TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)vsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)

See exactly how EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls map to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) maps to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) with 40% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(20 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification
→EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification
→EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment
DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→EBA-GL-3.5.1ICT Operations Management
DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
→EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security2 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
→EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy
EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
→EBA-GL-3.4.5Security Monitoring
EIOPA-GL-13Information Security Training and Awareness
→EBA-GL-3.4.7Information Security Training
EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
→EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security
EIOPA-GL-9Physical Security
→EBA-GL-3.4.3Physical Security
GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing
→EBA-GL-3.4.6Information Security Reviews and Testing
PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
→EBA-GL-3.5.1ICT Operations Management
TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements3 targets
→EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security
→EBA-GL-3.4.3Physical Security
→EBA-GL-3.5.2ICT Asset Management
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
→EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers
→EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework
→EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)22 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments20 mappings

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)19 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)18 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)18 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)18 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) has 50 controls across its framework, while EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 20 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) equivalent.

How many controls map between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

Of 50 total EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls, 20 map directly to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

30 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct equivalent in EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.