TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation

See exactly how EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

50
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 40% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 50 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(20 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs6 targets
→CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
→JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
→RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs6 targets
→CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
→JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
→RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
→OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security2 targets
→FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
EIOPA-GL-13Information Security Training and Awareness
→OMAN-PRO-04Security Awareness and Training
EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
→OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management
GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing
→KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
GLI33-4.3Data Protection and Encryption
→OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

+30 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)22 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)20 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments20 mappings

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) has 50 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 19 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

Of 50 total EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls, 20 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

30 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.