TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)vsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)

See exactly how EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls map to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
46%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) maps to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) with 46% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3.7 Business Continuity Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3.2 Governance and Strategy(1 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities

3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework(3 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification
→IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment
EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment
→IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment

3.4 Information Security(4 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security
→IMO-CY-2.1Access Control
EBA-GL-3.4.5Security Monitoring
→IMO-CY-3.1Anomaly Detection
EBA-GL-3.4.7Information Security Training
→IMO-CY-2.2Awareness and Training

3.5 ICT Operations Management(1 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.5.1ICT Operations Management
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning

3.6 ICT Project and Change Management(1 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities

3.7 Business Continuity Management(4 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.7.4Response and Recovery Plans2 targets
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
→IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning
EBA-GL-3.7.5Testing of Plans2 targets
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
→IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning

Related Comparisons

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)19 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)19 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)18 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202418 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)18 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs CSA CCM v417 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management17 mappings

Other IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)8 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)8 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) has 26 controls across its framework, while IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3.7 Business Continuity Management, where 3 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) equivalent.

How many controls map between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

Of 26 total EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls, 12 map directly to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

14 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct equivalent in IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). The highest concentration of gaps is in 3.7 Business Continuity Management with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3.7 Business Continuity Management (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.