Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security GuidelinesvsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)

See exactly how CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls map to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines maps to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) with 29% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access Control and Authentication.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Incident Response and Recovery(6 mappings)

AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery2 targets
IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning
AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration2 targets
IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning
AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing2 targets
IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning

Access Control and Authentication(5 mappings)

FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
IMO-CY-2.1Access Control
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
IMO-CY-2.1Access Control
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
IMO-CY-2.1Access Control

Network Security and Segmentation(1 mappings)

ICS-NS-5Network monitoring and intrusion detection
IMO-CY-3.1Anomaly Detection

Patch Management and System Hardening(2 mappings)

ICS-PM-1ICS patch management programme
IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
ICS-PM-4Security awareness training
IMO-CY-2.2Awareness and Training

Risk Assessment and Asset Management(1 mappings)

ICS-RA-3Risk assessment methodology
IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines comparisons

Other IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines has 42 controls across its framework, while IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control and Authentication, where 14 CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls have no direct IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

Of 42 total CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls, 12 map directly to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

30 CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls have no direct equivalent in IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control and Authentication with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control and Authentication (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.