EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)vsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)
See exactly how EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls map to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) maps to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) with 73% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
3.2 Governance and Strategy(3 mappings)
3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework(7 mappings)
3.4 Information Security(10 mappings)
+19 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons
Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) has 26 controls across its framework, while CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (73% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework, where 2 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) equivalent.
How many controls map between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
Of 26 total EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls, 19 map directly to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls — representing 73% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) to CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
7 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct equivalent in CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). The highest concentration of gaps is in 3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)?
The domain with the highest gap count is 3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.