TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)vsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)

See exactly how EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
73%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 73% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3.2 Governance and Strategy(4 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers3 targets
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-25Outsourcing of ICT Services
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management

3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework(7 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework3 targets
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification2 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment2 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs

3.4 Information Security(9 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security3 targets
→DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
→EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
→TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
EBA-GL-3.4.3Physical Security2 targets
→EIOPA-GL-9Physical Security
→TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
EBA-GL-3.4.5Security Monitoring
→EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
EBA-GL-3.4.6Information Security Reviews and Testing
→GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing
EBA-GL-3.4.7Information Security Training
→EIOPA-GL-13Information Security Training and Awareness

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)19 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)18 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202418 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)18 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs CSA CCM v417 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management17 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)17 mappings

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) has 26 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (73% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework, where 2 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.

How many controls map between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Of 26 total EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls, 19 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 73% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

7 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in 3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.