TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)

See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) with 33% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(11 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
→IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment
DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
→IMO-CY-2.1Access Control
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
→IMO-CY-3.1Anomaly Detection
EIOPA-GL-13Information Security Training and Awareness
→IMO-CY-2.2Awareness and Training
EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
→IMO-CY-2.1Access Control
PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
→IMO-CY-2.1Access Control
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities

Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery(7 mappings)

38.1051(c)BC-DR Planning2 targets
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
→IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning
38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives3 targets
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
→IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning
38.1051(c)(2)Geographic Separation of Backup2 targets
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
→IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning

Capacity and Performance(1 mappings)

38.1051(d)Capacity Planning
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning

Cybersecurity Testing(1 mappings)

38.1051(h)(5)Enterprise Technology Risk Assessment
→IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)25 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange24 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)24 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202424 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs CSA CCM v423 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 522 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappings

Other IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)8 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)8 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 49 controls across its framework, while IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 22 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) equivalent.

How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

Of 49 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 16 map directly to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

33 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.