TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment ExchangevsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)

See exactly how TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls map to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange maps to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) with 32% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(11 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
→IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment
DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
→IMO-CY-2.1Access Control
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
→IMO-CY-3.1Anomaly Detection
EIOPA-GL-13Information Security Training and Awareness
→IMO-CY-2.2Awareness and Training
EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
→IMO-CY-2.1Access Control
PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
→IMO-CY-2.1Access Control
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities

Assessment and Exchange(1 mappings)

TISAX-AE-02Assessment Process
→IMO-CY-5.2Lessons Learned

Information Security Management(2 mappings)

TISAX-ISM-02Risk Management
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
TISAX-ISM-03Human Resources Security
→IMO-CY-2.2Awareness and Training

Technical and Operational Controls(2 mappings)

TISAX-TECH-03Operations and Communications Security2 targets
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
→IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning

Related Comparisons

Other TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)26 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202425 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)25 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments24 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CSA CCM v424 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)23 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems23 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security23 mappings

Other IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)8 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange has 47 controls across its framework, while IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 22 TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls have no direct IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) equivalent.

How many controls map between TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

Of 47 total TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls, 15 map directly to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

32 TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls have no direct equivalent in IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.