TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in AviationvsNIST SP 800-30

See exactly how EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls map to NIST SP 800-30. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation maps to NIST SP 800-30 with 18% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Part-IS.AR: Authority Requirements(1 mappings)

IS.AR.210Findings and Corrective Actions
→NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF

Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645)(6 mappings)

IS.D.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment3 targets
→NISTSP30-3Threat Source and Threat Event Identification
→NISTSP30-4Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification
→NISTSP30-6Risk Determination, Uncertainty, and Sensitivity Analysis
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment3 targets
→NISTSP30-1Risk Management Strategy and Risk Assessment Programme Establishment
→NISTSP30-2Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping (Organisation, Mission/Business, Information System)
→NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF

Part-IS.I.OR: Organisation Requirements (Implementing Regulation EU 2023/203)(9 mappings)

IS.I.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment3 targets
→NISTSP30-3Threat Source and Threat Event Identification
→NISTSP30-4Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification
→NISTSP30-6Risk Determination, Uncertainty, and Sensitivity Analysis
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment3 targets
→NISTSP30-1Risk Management Strategy and Risk Assessment Programme Establishment
→NISTSP30-2Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping (Organisation, Mission/Business, Information System)
→NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management3 targets
→NISTSP30-1Risk Management Strategy and Risk Assessment Programme Establishment
→NISTSP30-2Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping (Organisation, Mission/Business, Information System)
→NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF

Related Comparisons

Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs ISO 27701:201911 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIS2 Directive8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NERC CIP8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs MTCS (Singapore)8 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs API 11648 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-30 comparisons

UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsISO 31000 vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsISO 27005 vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs NIST SP 800-306 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and NIST SP 800-30?

EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation has 34 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-30 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645), where 5 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct NIST SP 800-30 equivalent.

How many controls map between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and NIST SP 800-30?

Of 34 total EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-30 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation to NIST SP 800-30?

30 EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-30. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation and NIST SP 800-30?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part-IS.D.OR: Organisation Requirements (Delegated Regulation EU 2022/1645) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.