DORAvsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements
See exactly how DORA controls map to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DORA maps to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements with 17% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 DORA controls identifies 74 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ICT Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.
ICT Risk Management(10 mappings)
Incident Reporting(1 mappings)
Third-Party Risk(5 mappings)
DORA: Cybersecurity Controls(1 mappings)
DORA: Operational Resilience(3 mappings)
+15 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 769 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other DORA comparisons
Other US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 769 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DORA and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
DORA has 89 controls across its framework, while US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements covers 66 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ICT Risk Management, where 30 DORA controls have no direct US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.
How many controls map between DORA and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
Of 89 total DORA controls, 15 map directly to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 74 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
74 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in ICT Risk Management with 30 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
The domain with the highest gap count is ICT Risk Management (30 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.