Cross-Framework Mapping

DORAvsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation

See exactly how DORA controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

54
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DORA maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 28% coverage across 25 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 DORA controls identifies 64 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ICT Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 54 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

ICT Risk Management(12 mappings)

Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception2 targets
FAA-CS-4.2Incident Response
PNG-CC-CG-03Incident Response
Art.13Prohibition of Data Interference
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
Art.2Scope2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
Art.7Children's Data
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
Art.8Rights of Data Subjects2 targets
FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability

Incident Reporting(1 mappings)

Art.20Service Provider Duties
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

Resilience Testing(6 mappings)

Art.25Preservation of Stored Data6 targets
CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy

Third-Party Risk(1 mappings)

Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

+34 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 768 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between DORA and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

DORA has 89 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 68 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 25 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ICT Risk Management, where 27 DORA controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between DORA and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

Of 89 total DORA controls, 25 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 64 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

64 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in ICT Risk Management with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is ICT Risk Management (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.