Cross-Framework Mapping

DORAvsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)

See exactly how DORA controls map to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

46
Controls Mapped
43
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DORA maps to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) with 30% coverage across 27 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 DORA controls identifies 62 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ICT Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 46 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

ICT Risk Management(10 mappings)

Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception4 targets
CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
KR-CSAP-CC-03Incident Reporting
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline
Art.2Scope
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs
Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline
Art.7Children's Data
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline
Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs

Incident Reporting(1 mappings)

Art.19Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio Functions
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud

Resilience Testing(4 mappings)

Art.25Preservation of Stored Data3 targets
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
Art.26Production Orders
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud

Third-Party Risk(3 mappings)

Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline
Art.34Penalties for Legal Entities
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
Art.36Administrative Fines
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline

DORA: Information Security Governance(1 mappings)

DORA-05Roles and responsibilities definition
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs

DORA: Cybersecurity Controls(1 mappings)

DORA-06Network security and segmentation
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security

+26 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 768 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between DORA and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

DORA has 89 controls across its framework, while South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 27 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ICT Risk Management, where 28 DORA controls have no direct South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) equivalent.

How many controls map between DORA and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

Of 89 total DORA controls, 27 map directly to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 62 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

62 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP). The highest concentration of gaps is in ICT Risk Management with 28 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

The domain with the highest gap count is ICT Risk Management (28 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.