FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements
See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements with 33% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Incident Response and Reporting(16 mappings)
Purpose, Scope and Definitions(3 mappings)
Information Security Programme Standards(1 mappings)
+3 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Other US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 36 controls across its framework, while US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 10 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.
How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
Of 36 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 12 map directly to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
24 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.