Cross-Framework Mapping

DORAvsSouth Korea ISMS-P

See exactly how DORA controls map to South Korea ISMS-P. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

37
Controls Mapped
52
Gaps Found
28%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DORA maps to South Korea ISMS-P with 28% coverage across 25 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 DORA controls identifies 64 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ICT Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 37 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

ICT Risk Management(13 mappings)

Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response
Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud3 targets
ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation
Art.2Scope
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data3 targets
ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation
Art.7Children's Data3 targets
ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation
Art.8Rights of Data Subjects
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management

Incident Reporting(1 mappings)

Art.19Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio Functions
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer

Resilience Testing(3 mappings)

Art.25Preservation of Stored Data2 targets
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
Art.26Production Orders
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer

Third-Party Risk(3 mappings)

Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data3 targets
ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation

+17 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 768 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between DORA and South Korea ISMS-P?

DORA has 89 controls across its framework, while South Korea ISMS-P covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 25 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ICT Risk Management, where 28 DORA controls have no direct South Korea ISMS-P equivalent.

How many controls map between DORA and South Korea ISMS-P?

Of 89 total DORA controls, 25 map directly to South Korea ISMS-P controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 64 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DORA to South Korea ISMS-P?

64 DORA controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea ISMS-P. The highest concentration of gaps is in ICT Risk Management with 28 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DORA and South Korea ISMS-P?

The domain with the highest gap count is ICT Risk Management (28 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.