CSA CCM v4vsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements
See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CSA CCM v4 maps to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements with 13% coverage across 23 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 148 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(9 mappings)
DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(9 mappings)
IAM - Identity & Access Management(2 mappings)
+18 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons
Other US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 23 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 21 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.
How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 23 map directly to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 148 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
148 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?
The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.