TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)vsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
66
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 15% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 92 Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls identifies 78 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 92 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(10 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→IR-2Incident Documentation
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
→IR-2Incident Documentation
EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
→IR-4Continuous Monitoring
EIOPA-GL-9Physical Security3 targets
→33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
→33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
→33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP
GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing
→VES-3Penetration Testing
TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements3 targets
→33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
→33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
→33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP

Personnel Security(2 mappings)

CTPAT-PE-2Employee Screening
→VES-1US-Flagged Vessel Cybersecurity
PSPF-PERS-4Separation and Transfer
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Security Governance(2 mappings)

DSPF-GOV-5Security Investigations and Reporting2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

ICT and Cyber Security(3 mappings)

DSPF-ICT-3Cyber Security Monitoring
→IR-4Continuous Monitoring
DSPF-ICT-4Cyber Incident Response2 targets
→CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
→CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Physical Security(3 mappings)

DSPF-PHYS-4Security Equipment3 targets
→33CFR105.305Facility Security Assessment
→33CFR105.400Facility Security Plan (FSP)
→33CFR105.405Format and Content of FSP

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange39 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202437 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements36 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)36 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security36 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)36 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts36 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments35 mappings

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) has 92 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 27 Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 92 total Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls, 14 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 78 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

78 Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.